Dropbox Watchdog

Search issues

Search the Dropbox Watchdog archive

All issues

Dropbox v. Thru: the fight over who owns the 'Dropbox' name

2014–2018

MediumStatus: ResolvedYear: 2015

Thru Inc. claimed it had used the term 'Dropbox' since 2004 and threatened the company's trademark; Dropbox sued first for declaratory relief, won summary judgment, and the Ninth Circuit affirmed — with a roughly $2.3 million attorneys'-fee award against Thru.

What happened

File-transfer company Thru Inc. asserted that it had used the term 'dropbox' for a feature dating back to 2004 and challenged Dropbox, Inc.'s rights to the name, opposing Dropbox's trademark applications. After years of back-and-forth, Dropbox took the dispute to court, filing a declaratory-judgment action in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California (Dropbox, Inc. v. Thru Inc., Case No. 15-cv-01741-EMC) seeking a ruling that it did not infringe and that Thru had no enforceable rights.

In November 2016 the district court granted Dropbox summary judgment. It found that Dropbox held senior rights to the 'Dropbox' name through an assignment from another party, and that even if Thru had any rights, Thru was barred by laches — the court characterizing Thru as having deliberately delayed asserting its claim for years in hopes of increasing its settlement value. The court deemed the case 'exceptional' under the Lanham Act and awarded Dropbox roughly $2.3 million in attorneys' fees and costs.

Thru appealed. On 25 April 2018 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court's rulings in full, upholding Dropbox's senior rights, the laches finding, and the fee award. The decision ended the dispute in Dropbox's favor.

Impact

The case secured Dropbox's exclusive claim to its own brand name — an existential issue for a company whose identity is the word 'Dropbox.' The exceptional-case finding and multimillion-dollar fee award also stood as a warning about laches in trademark disputes: a rights-holder who sits on a claim while a competitor's brand becomes globally famous may recover nothing and pay the other side's legal bills.

Dropbox's Response / Official Position

Dropbox pursued the litigation proactively as the plaintiff, seeking declaratory relief, and publicly treated the rulings as a vindication of its rights to the Dropbox name. After prevailing it sought, and was awarded, its attorneys' fees as the prevailing party in an exceptional case.

Sources

Related guides

Spot an error, or have a source to add?
Report an error / suggest update

Related issues

3 sources
HighHundreds of thousands (Sign-breach class, now in arbitration)

2025: Dropbox forces the Sign-breach class action into private arbitration

A federal judge compelled the users suing over the 2024 Dropbox Sign breach into individual arbitration — finding that by clicking 'I agree' to sign a document they had accepted Dropbox's terms — and then denied reconsideration, effectively shutting the class action out of court.

Legal Actions & LawsuitsCurrent / Ongoing Issues (2024–2026)Account Lockouts & Support Failures
Read documentation

A consumer law firm opened an investigation into Dropbox Plus auto-renewals in 2025, as strengthened automatic-renewal laws in California and New York raised the bar for consent, reminders, and easy cancellation.

Legal Actions & LawsuitsPricing & Business PracticesAccount Lockouts & Support Failures
Read documentation

Activist investor Half Moon Capital pressed Dropbox to dismantle the dual-class share structure that gives co-founder Drew Houston majority voting control, arguing that entrenched founder control and slowing growth were holding back value as the stock languished near multi-year lows.

Legal Actions & LawsuitsPricing & Business PracticesCurrent / Ongoing Issues (2024–2026)
Read documentation

A pension fund shareholder sued Dropbox and its leadership in the Delaware Court of Chancery in 2025 over the company's plan to reincorporate in Nevada, alleging the move favored controlling stockholder and CEO Andrew Houston — in what was reported as the first court challenge to Delaware's controversial SB 21 corporate-law amendments.

Legal Actions & LawsuitsCurrent / Ongoing Issues (2024–2026)
Read documentation